Leaked: How Britain Exploits US Empire

Leaked: How Britain Exploits US Empire Kit Klarenberg (substack.com › @kitklarenberg) Substack Donald Trump entered the July 7th/8th NATO summit (lilyslynch.com › in ankara nato returns to its roots) having recently condemned (cnbc.com) the alliance as a “paper tiger” over its collective failure to abet the calamitous Zionist-American war (kitklarenberg.com › total victory how iran defeated israel) on Iran, repeatedly threatened (cnbc.com › trump nato summit greenland us troops europe) to withdraw US forces from Europe, with reveries of Greenland’s annexation still abounding (economy.ac). He left boasting (cfr.org) of the intense “love” and “unity” within NATO, while praising member states for their reaffirmed commitment to spending ever-increasingly vast sums on ‘defence’. Meanwhile, the Ukraine proxy war’s world-threatening continuation appears assured for potentially years to come. As such, the NATO summit signifies a significant triumph in Britain’s neverending battle to exploit the US Empire to further her own objectives. Highly revealing leaked files amply spell out how the alliance is a key mechanism by which Washington’s “interest” in Europe and West Asia is insidiously maintained, via London’s covert and overt machinations. NATO provides an invaluable “umbrella”, by which Britain projects economic, intelligence, military, and political power throughout these regions and the wider world, while countering competitors. (i0.wp.com)NATO member state leaders gather in Ankara, 2026 The documents were authored in March 2021 by Chris Donnelly, a veteran British military intelligence apparatchik who masterminded (academic.oup.com) NATO expansion into the former Soviet Union, Warsaw Pact and Yugoslavia throughout the 1990s. Now an influential Ministry of Defence advisor guiding London and Kiev’s escalatory strategies (thegrayzone.com › ukrainian kerch bridge) in the proxy war, he writes in the leaks of Britain’s perpetual struggle to retain the “security” provided by “US military power.” This, combined with access to Washington’s globe-spanning intelligence network (kitklarenberg.com › rip five eyes global spying network), “underpins our own position in the world.” From Britain’s perspective, “the political solidarity between member nations” within NATO, and “the permanent political and military mechanisms that enable collaboration between its members and with its partners,” are as vitally important as the alliance’s capacity for “collective defence and security.” For example, “interoperability” between NATO members is considered “both a political and a military asset” and “valuable product”, enabling countries “with vastly different political and military systems to operate together.” That includes “[undertaking] complex and stressful military activities,” and other joint functions. This makes NATO “a civilian-led political organisation…whose main tool is armed force,” intimately entrenched within its 32 members. Lacking any democratic structures internally and accountable to none externally, the alliance exerts enormous, often unseen influence over members’ constituent governments, security and intelligence services, militaries, police forces, and more. These “extensive political collaborative mechanisms” mean states can be corralled into adopting policies or taking actions regardless o